Raising Globally Mobile Kids: What UK Parents Should Know Before Choosing Dubai
Is This You? You’re a UK parent planning to relocate to Dubai for tax, lifestyle, or business reasons, but you’re...
Suspendisse interdum consectetur libero id. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non. Euismod viverra nibh cras pulvinar suspen.

In the UK, every debate about “fairness” in taxation leaves out one uncomfortable truth: 100% of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) is paid by the top 5% of earners.
This isn’t ideology. It isn’t political messaging. It’s HMRC data.
And it exposes a deeper structural problem — the UK doesn’t just depend on high earners. It depends almost entirely on a very small group of investors, founders, and business owners to fund national growth.
Capital Gains Tax is meant to encourage investment, risk-taking, and wealth creation. Instead, in the UK, it has become a concentrated financial burden on a tiny minority who take the risks that fuel the economy. When the top 5% fund 100% of CGT, it tells us something about the tax system, but it tells us even more about the country’s economic future.
This blog breaks down the data, explains why the UK’s CGT model is unsustainable, and outlines why more founders and investors are exploring Dubai, where investment returns are treated as the foundation of growth — not a target for taxation.
High earners in the UK already fund an overwhelming share of national revenue:
But when it comes to CGT, the concentration is even more extreme:
Every pound of Capital Gains Tax collected by HMRC comes from the top 5% of earners.
This is because CGT applies to:
These are activities dominated by high earners, investors, and founders — the people who drive economic dynamism.
The top 1%, typically individuals earning £180,000+, are the most economically active group in:
This means they are disproportionately exposed to CGT changes.
When CGT rises, the top 1% pay more.
When rules tighten, the top 1% comply at higher cost.
When investment becomes less attractive, the top 1% relocate first.
This group is not just paying taxes — they fund the capital ecosystem.
The top 5%:
This creates a structural imbalance:
A country of 67 million people relies on 1.7 million to fund the majority of public services and nearly all investment-related taxes.
If 5–10% of this group:
the UK faces a sharp decline in:
CGT is not just a tax. It is a pressure point on the entire economic architecture.
HMRC and ONS data show:
When a tax system becomes this narrow, it becomes volatile and dependent on a small cohort of contributors.
This is why many economists argue the UK now behaves like a low-participant, high-dependency state:
Too few people work, invest, and take risks — yet many rely on the system.
This is not inequality of income.
This is inequality of contribution.
Investment is punished in the UK through:
And yet investment is what drives:
When the tax code punishes investment, the economy slows.
Recent Budgets and fiscal consultations suggest:
For founders, this means:
For investors:
The message is clear:
The UK sees investment as a taxable event, not a national priority.
The UK tax burden:
38.5% of GDP — highest since the 1940s.
Meanwhile:
When a tax system becomes both:
high-cost and low-value,
high earners begin exploring alternatives.
CGT is often the final catalyst — the tipping point.
The UK has:
This means:
The fewer people working →
the more the tax burden shifts to investors and high earners →
creating a loop of dependency.
When the UK needs investment most, it taxes it more aggressively.
This is economically backwards.
Recent migration data:
Many of the people leaving:
These are the individuals who:
When they leave, they take:
The UK cannot afford to lose them — but it is.
Indicators of an accelerating brain drain:
A country can survive losing consumers.
It cannot survive losing creators.
High earners consistently cite:
But CGT is unique — it punishes the outcome of success.
A founder builds a business for 10 years, risks everything, creates jobs, then sells — and faces a punitive tax environment.
This is the opposite of how competitive economies treat entrepreneurs.
A simple comparison:
| Tax Type | UK | Dubai |
| Capital Gains | Up to 28% | 0% |
| Dividends | Up to 39.35% | 0% |
| Income | Up to 45% | 0% |
| Inheritance Tax | 40% | 0% |
| Wealth Tax | Emerging | None |
| Corporation Tax | 25% | 9% (0% free-zone qualifying income) |
Dubai is not simply low-tax.
It is intentionally structured to reward investment and support wealth creation, knowing that:
Moving to Dubai allows founders, investors, and entrepreneurs to:
Dubai offers:
This is why hundreds of UK founders now plan their exits from Dubai — not London.
If you are a founder, investor, or high-income professional, you already feel the shift. The UK treats your risk as taxable, your productivity as expected, and your success as suspicious. Dubai treats your ambition as an asset.
Your capital deserves to compound.
Your success deserves to be yours.
And your future deserves clarity, not uncertainty.
If you are even thinking about exploring alternatives, that’s your signal.
The world has changed — your residency strategy must change with it.
👉 Take the Wealth Reclaimed Scorecard
👉 Book a 20-min Strategy Call
Is This You? You’re a UK parent planning to relocate to Dubai for tax, lifestyle, or business reasons, but you’re...
Is This You? You’ve built your business from the ground up, but 2026 introduces unprecedented UK exit tax rules that...
Is This You? You’ve built a thriving business, accumulated wealth, and strategically expanded, yet the UK is introducing significant 2026...